The way Calvino wrote Invisible Cities makes it an interesting
but complex book to read. Even though I have tried to understand it, in the
following chapters I would like to get to know where all these allegories or
metaphors are going to and what they actually mean all together. The first
aspect that came to my mind was that its chapter introductions and conclusions
(the interludes), which are a conversation between Kublai Khan and Marco Polo,
are describing the book itself, making it metaliterary, like Mr Tangen
explained in class. Marco Polo represents the author and Kublai Khan represents
the readers, showing how the author tells stories to the readers, and
describing the way these relate an how the author communicates using the book.
It is interesting to try to decipher what the metaliterature parts of the book
mean, but I hope that when reading the rest of the book my questions about what
it means are answered.
Another interesting
aspect of the book is the way its chapters are divided. I decided to read the
book in the natural order of the pages, rather than through the types of
sections. In the way I have read it, it seems that each chapter has an
introduction and a conclusion that relate to the chapters in between. These
sections, which have dialogues between the two characters, have helped me as a
reader since they make sense out of descriptions of cities. I feel like the
interludes have helped me understand that in the first section Kublai Khan
feels some sort of deterioration and that Marco Polo’s cities are meant to be
interpreted, or that they are not just accounts of his expeditions. I hope that
when continuing to read the book I can understand better the purpose for its
structure.
No comments:
Post a Comment